Sack farms in Mathare

Katy Fentress, Nairobi Community ManagerKaty Fentress, Nairobi Community Manager

For many people in Nairobi's Mathare slum, food insecurity is a simple fact of life. Even the slightest hike in prices can prove sufficient to exclude them from their daily meal. A large proportion of the inhabitants of Mathare, as well as those living in Nairobi's other informal settlements, can be considered to be living in a perpetual state of emergency. Humanitarian policy makers are actively seeking to address this problem, but with mixed results. Meanwhile, however, Mathare residents are learning to supplement insecure food sources with an urban agricultural alternative dubbed "Farm in a Sack."

The inability to always guarantee food on the table, whether because of market fluctuations or unemployment, has for decades pushed Mathare residents to make do with tiny patches of land on which to grow a few heads of sukuma wiki (kale — literally, "push weekly": it pushes you through the week). Over time, however, with the amount of farmable land decreasing along with the quality of the soil, sustaining this practice has become a major challenge.

In light of that challenge, urban agriculture (UA) has recently become a priority in both emergency and development policy planning, according to Robert Biel and Yves Cabannes, affiliates of the Development Planning Unit (DPU) at University College London. In an article on UA co-authored by Biel and Cabannes, they say urban farming has not only helped to see impoverished urban families through difficult times, but also helped keep communities together by encouraging them to "guarantee their own social and economic reproduction in a low-cost way or outside of the monetary economy" (2009, DPUnews, issue 51).

One of the more popular solutions to creating sustainable urban agriculture in impoverished neighbourhoods has been the concept of "Farm in a Sack" agriculture. This concept involves taking a burlap (or similar) sack, filling it with a core of rocks surrounded by soil, and growing crops out of little holes in the side. This "vertical" method increases dramatically the amount of produce that can be grown: instead of 15 plants of sukuma wiki per square metre, the "Farm in a Sack" method can enable families to grow up to 60.

Farm in a Sack, which has been introduced to Mathare over the years by various NGOs, has produced differing results depending on the methodology used. The most successful project so far appears to be the most recent, a project completed in 2010 by the Italian NGO COOPI.

Claudio Torres, an architect who works with COOPI in Mathare, tells us that "different organisations have tried this technique and failed." According to Torres, the problem stems from unrealistic expectations: the "projects didn't work out because they just gave people sacks and seedlings and expected them to go and get the earth themselves."

"The shacks that people live in were simply too small for this to work," adds Torres, who spearheaded COOPI's Mathare urban agriculture initiative. "Also, the soil that was used was depleted Mathare soil," which was not rich enough to make the plants grow abundantly.

Taking a more hands-on approach, COOPI took great pains to provide all the necessary materials to get the project underway, including a rich soil sourced in a nearby forest. The full sacks came to about $10 each, a cost that was covered by the NGO and its donors. The sacks were placed together in plots of land that were protected by a fence and irrigated by a water tank. This communal aspect of the initiative was, in Torres' view, one of the major factors that guaranteed its success.

The project officially ended after six months, but has been continuing informally ever since. A quick trip down to an assigned plot by the Mathare River reveals how many of the bags that COOPI provided are still there, proof that people continued using the method even after the logistical support had ended.

According to Torres, sack farms could eventually provide a sustainable solution for the community. He feels, however, that there is still much room for improvement, emphasizing that in order for this method to be sustainable, there are several steps that must be taken. These would include creating a local nursery for seedlings and installing a water treatment plant, so users can access the Mathare River and benefit from year-round irrigation. It would also be necessary to create a compost system using manure and other organic waste collected from around the area, Torres adds.

Comments

Introduce efficient cookstoves, such as TLUD, that has a char coproduct (sometimes called biochar) and use the char for soil improvement and maintenance. The char will adsorb cations such as ammonium in the manures used to maintain fertility and reduce losses to leaching and denitrification. This will increase yields without increasing inputs. Efficient cooking and efficient growing: two of a poor woman's biggest issues.

More on the above suggestion can be found here:

http://worldstove.org/

Start with the "about us" page.

QUOTE:

It's not the only stove, or the only type of stove. It's not a novel notion and makes good sense to think in terms of the whole kitchen system: growing and cooking, waste management etc. are all part of the muck and mystery of domesticity, and IMV improving any part of the system is best done using integrated, complementary methods. Each hack is more effective when it fits and enhances other other parts of the routine.

:UNQUOTE

Hello visitor,

Thank you for your comment.

You are entirely correct in championing this kind of stove as they are indeed an efficient answer to the issue of cooking with waste by-products. However there is a slight problem that arises again and again in this kind of situation: although there are indeed quite a few stoves available on the Kenyan market that are good for burning biogas, the main issue is one of affordability. Your average slum family does not and will not have the extra cash to buy the stove. People burn charcoal here and they have charcoal burning stoves. People can't afford to buy an alternative stove and only a project which will succeed in raising their incomes or which will distribute the stoves for free (but the fuel can't be more expensive than charcoal or it still won't work) will succeed in breaking the market for fossil fuels.

Katy

@whatktdoes

Hi,

I am interested in buying the sukuma wiki in Nursery to replant/transfer to my garden. Do you sell?

Hi Mildred, urb.im is a platform for discussing issues and solutions related to urban poverty across the world and as such we don't provide sponsorship for programs or sell any of the products we might discuss in our articles.
With regards to the Mathare Farm in a Sack project, I believe that COOPI is no longer funding it directly as they have had all funding for slum upgrading slashed over the past year. The Farm in the Sack gardens are however still there and I believe they are fully functioning. They are situated (if memory serves) in Mathare 3 or 4A on a terrace close to the river where the chang'aa brewers are. You can drop by and ask someone there about starting your own urban garden.
Please let us know how it goes!

@whatktdoes

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.