Twenty years to define resettlement
Tam Nguyen, Ho Chi Minh City Community Manager
Since 1984: Resettlement Initiated
In the ten years after the Vietnam War, there were few housing projects built in Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon). The government mostly repaired and distributed existing houses to families of government officials. The government started to accumulate resources for new housing projects to resettle families living along the polluted inner-city canals. These canals were, and still have been, the biggest slum communities in HCMC.
Since then, resettlement has been vigorous. In 1985, 7,340 new houses were built using the city's budget. In 1996, families living along canals in four main districts started to resettle — 6,863 families were resettled before 2000. The number reached 13,353 families in 2006, and has still been increasing.
Late 2000s: Problems Revealed
Surveys of the HCMC Institute of Development Studies in 2009 revealed immense challenges surrounding resettled families: issues with income, schooling, vocational training, etc. Among these, the drop in income due to losing old jobs was the most dramatic.
Examples were abundant. Every day, Mr. Trần Trọng Nghĩa, head of a resettled family, had to travel with his children a very long distance back to their former neighborhood for low-paid jobs, for they could not find jobs in their new and still sparsely inhabited resettlement area. Another sparse neighborhood also forced Mrs. Mã Kim Hoa and her two sisters, formerly a street food seller with daily income of VND 200,000-300,000 (USD $9-$14), into unemployment because there were not many people around to sell food to. According to the HCMC Farmer Association, in 2009 there were only 15 percent of resettled families earning a good income, 45 percent were trying to maintain a stable income and 35 percent were facing economic difficulty.
Besides employment, very few resettled communities could adequately provide other social amenities. They lacked schools for children, entertainment sites for youth, markets for homemakers, parks and other communal spaces for the elderly. Many groups of families ended up leaving these "better" homes to come back and illegally rebuild informal settlements in crowded districts of HCMC.
Starting in 2014: Resettlement Redefined
Multiple reports, articles, and even television broadcasts have made it clear that resettlement projects focusing solely on housing are a failed solution for informal communities. A better house alone brings no better livelihood. "Integrated resettlement," which cares about surrounding facilities and amenities needed for a better standard of living, has recently starting coming up more frequently in recent years.
A number of integrated solutions have recently been proposed. One is same-place resettlement, where families would be supported to find temporary houses until their old informal communities are rebuilt into better housing. The on-going Saigon Makeover Competition, organized by Global Shapers of World Economic Forum with support from the government, is indeed seeing many creative same-place resettlement proposals for slum communities (photo 1 & 2). Another solution encourages more complete social facilities in each housing contract, emphasizing the short-term cost for a longer-term attraction for well-integrated communities.
Suggested solutions are promising, but new and few in number. However, with the problem redefined, hopefully the next steps to address these challenges will be faster and stronger. Close.
Photo 1: "Revive a city"s corner," Saigon Makeover Competition - Authors: Nguyễn Ngọc Quỳnh Thy, Đỗ Kim Chung, Phan Xuân Thiện. Photo 2: "Saigon Playing," Saigon Makeover Competition - Authors: DNK Studio" Vũ Xuân Dự, Thân Minh Nhật và Lưu Hoàng Kiếm.
Permalink to this discussion: http://urb.im/c1411
Permalink to this post: http://urb.im/ca1411hce
Comments
Land titles leading to gentrification?
Hi Ana,
Interesting development that you've covered in Caracas. You outline some of the risks associated with land titling in informal areas, but I wonder if gentrification is one that is also experienced in Caracas? In many cases globally where informal land has been titled this has encouraged the 'original' residents to sell their land following formalisation leading to gentrification of these areas while the 'original' residents sometimes move to other informal areas. One way to control for this has been to bar recipients of land titles from selling their plots within a certain amount of time following receipt of the land title. Other options are for the government to secure tenure but not actually give 'sellable' land titles for X amount of years. There are also ways other than land titles to secure tenure in informal settlements, depending on the layout and living standards in a settlement (a la the tenure security continuum). Do these issues feature in the discourse in Caracas?
Drawbacks from inadequate consideration to policy process
Interesting points you raise Nora,regarding controls and it is clear from all the situation of the various cities, that process of securing titles and tenancy is a very important factor from informal to formal. Similar controls are being implemented in Lagos for the new housing projects limiting the number of times ownership can be transferred and period of time before it can be transferred, the hope is this is implemented properly and due process followed.
As this week's topic has shown it is not enough for policy to be in place, the implementation process affects whether or not there will be drawbacks such as gentrification you and Jorge pointed out and the sustainability of the policy. Also, as seen from Dar es Salaam, Ho chi minh , Lagos and others lack of attention to process can affect implementation in various ways be it reluctance to begin/complete the process as in Lagos due to cumbersome nature, or lack of adequate provision and attention to the multifaceted nature of resettlement which creates new set of urban issues. Creating a good policy requires stable and widely encompasing processes so urban planning is less reactionary and more proactive.
Urban Commons for Neighbourhoods That Work
Hi Olatawura Lapido-Ajayi
I think you & I might be on the same wave length.
I believe "titling" of land leads to wealth for some and poverty for others who get marginalised.
Titling also prepares land for capture by the elite when the desperate poor must sell.
If we are looking at land reform, we don't really need to worry too much about the group who will become owners - they can look after themselves - but we do need to wory about those who are negatively effected by this system of ownership of that which is actually a birthright ALL should have GUARANTEED secure access to - as to air! If we don't guarantee that, life itself is conditional on this ownership system - what does that make of human rights?!
Land reform must begin with guaranteeing human rights - the only ones whose rights are threatened are those who cannot buy their access to the elements for life - the free gifts of nature for life.
With technological job redundancy & global competition, this is a group that is destined to grow, in spite of economic growth.
I would like to see urban commons established in every neighbourhood for eligible people to establish secure housing and community (non commercial) food gardens. Their presence in neighbourhoods everywhere would be an attractive presence which would vitalise gentrifying but lifeless dormitory suburbs.
With such urban commons there would be no need to worrry about "social inclusion" or lack of paying employment - collaboration & cooperation would thrive and compliment the benefits others create through their engagement with the competitive economy.
For a brief "vision" of how this could lay the building blocks for sustainable development, have a look at http://landrights4all.weebly.com/neighbourhoods-that-work.html
Chris
@landrights4all (Twitter)
Urban Commons
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your insights. I do agree we are on the same wave length, Land in a country of birth should really be a given for everyone like council flats in the UK. In the capital city, FCT, this is available. For some places like Lagos, with its small land mass better regulations and reforms are certainly required. However some intricacies are inevitable in land matters. I looked into the concept of Urban commons, and it is definitely work looking into. Brings to mind how things were done in the old days in villages and if it worked then, its definitely worth a re visit for urban centers. How would one go about implementing this though, it still requires a measure of government regulation and land security? It can be argued this comes with titling/ tenancy agreements.
I believe a similar commune is under way in South Africa, Tariq wrote about it a while back, you should also check out that article.
formal or informal?
Hi Tariq, interesting insight from Cape Town on informalizing the formal.
But what is the city government point of view towards the informal traders? And so far what kind of policy issued to help those in informal economy to enter formal economy. I am asking because as I understand those who are in informal economy do not pay taxes hence many cities encouraged them to work in formal sectors because city government can get revenue from the business. There is also retribution type of revenue, which also applied to informal traders who open their business at government land such as park or parking lot (Indonesia have many like this). Adding to this, can I ask what makes the government shift their focus from a regulatory role to developmental role? This is interesting to me because so far, many Indonesian government only understood to formalize informal business.
Crecimiento formal
Jorge, el proyecto de reconversión en la zona de Fenicia me parece muy atractivo para formalizar a los habitantes de la zona; podrías ahondar sobre los servicios y el costo de estos, es decir, ¿en la zona ya hay servicios públicos para los habitantes? ¿Cómo es que pueden tener acceso a ellos dependiendo del estrato? Saludos
Hola María Fernanda. El
Hola María Fernanda. El sistema de estratos fue ideado como una forma de subsidios cruzados, en la que loe estratos mas altos pagan una tarifa superior cuyo importe se utiliza íntegramente para que los estratos mas bajos tengan unas tarifas subvencionadas. Los estratos no se determinan por los ingresos de cada individuo o de sus unidades familiares, sino a nivel zonal, dependiendo del nivel de servicios y calidad de cada zona individual. Es decir, una manzana puede ser de un estrato, y la siguiente puede ser de un estrato distinto, pero en una manzana todos sus habitantes son del mismo estrato. Todos los habitantes de una zona estrato 1, por ejemplo, tienen de forma automática las tarifas subsidiadas correspondientes a ese estrato, sin tener que solicitarlo
El sistema tiene sus problemas. Entre ellos, que de alguna forma perpetúa la segregación, pues las personas de los estratos 1 y 2 se lo piensan mucho antes de mudarse a zonas de estrato superior, pues el coste de los servicios públicos sube de forma significativa. Ya escribí sobre el tema en URB.IM: http://urb.im/ca130923bts
Government support for upgrading
Hi Tam,
Thanks for an interesting article. The challenges with resettlement that you outline are sadly the norm when it comes to government-driven resettlement. It was interesting to read that there now is at least discussion about on-site upgrading or same-place resettlement. How strongly do you think the government backs this? My question is related to the motivation behind previous resettlements - were the poor really moved to enhance their living conditions, or did the government have ulterior motives, such as getting access to valuable real estate? In Cambodia, the government has orchestrated mass evictions in Phnom Penh to get hold of valuable real estate which is then sold or leased to dubious companies..(see e.g. the Boeung Kak case in central Phnom Penh - http://saveboeungkak.wordpress.com/)
Informality by the rich
Hi Carlin, your article points out at a reality that is very present in Colombia, particularly in Bogotá: informal settlements are not only made by the poor, they are also made by the very rich. In Bogota, the Eastern Hills, a natural reserve with the highest protection levels, are under threat by luxury condominiums. Some of the most expensive apartments in the city, which can cost several million dollars, have been built there. Of course, they more affluent have the resources to eventually give legal appearance to their illegal developments.
Public awareness and higher scrutiny are making this kind of luxury illegal settlements increasingly difficult, but still the risk is there.
Location, Location, Location...
Thanks for all of the great insights into your cities! Tariq, I like your final statement in your article stating the formal need to be informalised. It is not a one way street and in order to achieve urban inclusion questions and changes are required within formal and informal land. The current focus often tends to see the informal as requiring inclusion into the formal system, without questioning the suitability, feasibility, and sustainability. But also additionally, the links between the formal and informal land systems are often not recognised. So it is good to see that Cape Town is making such changes.
Within this complex comes the question of location, location, and location - who gets what piece of land, where, and why? Urban space is competitive and the question of location is defined by geographical inequalities (concerning economics, race, etc). Therefore I am wondering within the question of location and including the informal what stakeholders play a key role and require engagement? Governments, but also businesses and corporates are increasingly controlling city space. Therefore in discussing city space and (in)formalisation policy needs a platform whereby such groups can be engaged.
Dignity & Land Reforms
Priyanka, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your article on forced resettlement and human rights issues in Delhi. This is an issue faced by many Nairobi residents and will likely increase as the country continues to develop. I was inspired by the grassroots citizen agency approach you highlighted and believe there is a great deal that can be learned from these efforts. In all major cities globally, it is the poor who are often relocated. We call it gentrification and urban development, but in the end it is the forced relocation of families to meet the needs of industrialization. I agree with you completely that a more human-centered approach needs to be incorporated in this design.
Add new comment